|
|
|
|
| Re: Petra's No Big Deal |
Hi All. Forgot the most important part. The quake Petra predicted was at 35.290N/120.290W. This is 17 miles WSW of Simmler, California. I know she said the Lompoc area, but she didn’t have her map with so it was a guess. Anyway she knows that if she doesn’t do the math I will. No “moment tensor solution” for these quakes and I suspect there won’t be any because of the location. Take Care…Don in creepy town Follow Ups: ● Re: Petra's No Big Deal - chris in suburbia 03:57:28 - 1/9/2004 (21015) (1) ● Re: Petra's No Big Deal - Petra Challus 18:12:39 - 1/9/2004 (21021) (1) ● Re: Petra's No Big Deal - chris in sububia 05:18:48 - 1/10/2004 (21025) (2) ● Re: Petra's No Big Deal - Petra 06:18:14 - 1/10/2004 (21027) (1) ● Re: Petra's No Big Deal - Roger Hunter 08:40:49 - 1/10/2004 (21029) (0) ● Chris, there's a problem - Roger Hunter 06:04:41 - 1/10/2004 (21026) (2) ● Re: Chris, there's a problem - chris in suburbia 14:04:27 - 1/10/2004 (21041) (1) ● Re: Chris, there's a problem - Roger Hunter 14:42:08 - 1/10/2004 (21045) (1) ● Shan's predictions - chris in suburbia 07:10:21 - 1/11/2004 (21056) (1) ● Re: Shan's predictions - Roger Hunter 07:19:19 - 1/11/2004 (21057) (0) ● Additional information requested - EQF 09:48:42 - 1/10/2004 (21033) (1) ● Re: Additional information requested - Roger Hunter 10:57:58 - 1/10/2004 (21035) (1) ● Re: Additional information requested - EQF 13:20:59 - 1/10/2004 (21039) (1) ● Re: Additional information requested - Roger Hunter 14:02:43 - 1/10/2004 (21040) (1) ● Ok. That helps (NT) - EQF 14:22:02 - 1/10/2004 (21044) (0) |
|
|
|
|
