|
Re: For Mary C. Answer To Your Question |
Hi Steve. There is some good logic in the method USGS is using, but I have to wonder just how good it really is. The Hector Mine quake had 10 foreshocks none of which was greater then M>3.7. This was in a radius of less then 2Km. The Landers quake had 24 foreshocks none of which were larger then M>3.6. This is with a radius of less then 1Km. The Northridge quake had no foreshocks. At least nothing that stood out. So here we have 3 quakes with close to the same magnitudes. Two were preceded by a vigorous foreshock activity while the other snuck in. It seems to me that while based on just two quakes a vigorous swarm of quakes such as the ones that preceded the Landers and Hector Mine quakes may/should also be looked at in terms of issuing a warning. My speculation is that they are. Of course you can’t issue a warning every time there is a swarm of quakes, but it sure wouldn’t hurt to make people aware of it. Take Care…Don in creepy town Follow Ups: ● those foreshocks too small for alarm - John VIdale 23:09:21 - 9/8/2003 (19392) (1) ● Re: those foreshocks too small for alarm - Don in Hollister 00:10:15 - 9/9/2003 (19394) (1) ● Re: those foreshocks too small for alarm - chris in suburbia 08:26:11 - 9/11/2003 (19397) (1) ● a few highlights of SCEC - John Vidale 13:49:02 - 9/11/2003 (19398) (1) ● Re: a few highlights of SCEC - Don in Hollister 14:06:52 - 9/11/2003 (19399) (0) |
|