|
Re: Just For You |
Hey Bud, Yeah, I did say Bud, not EQF, but Bud. This is my own personal opinion. I've attached a link below for your own personal use. Its the world clock and in many countries its 12/27. How kind of me to tell you that no one responded to your post at your request. So why did you post it if you didn't want anyone to reply? Maybe it would get lost in a flurry of posts and then no one would see it? Gosh..... So lets cut to the chase here. If you were a scientist and you didn't follow the rules, you'd be out of the club. Right? While we don't really have any rules about how a person "must" post a prediction, we simply cannot afford you "hits" if you don't post your predictions before you tell us you got a "hit." On the web anyone can change their web site without anyone knowing what you posted there, unless they look at the site hour by hour to see what is there. So what proof have we got that you really posted those predictions before the quakes occured? Zero, nada, zimbu. No way Man. Being as polite as humanly possible I have to say, "you frost my cookies." I know I am not alone is that feeling, but you just do. So, do you think its possible to play the game here like everyone else, or do you have to be standoffish and keep telling us about your glorious success after the fact? I think your post and request for a later response was rude. If you didn't wish to have a response you should have waited until after the 26th and then posted the message. Or simply read the responses when you were ready. You rarely if ever answer anyway, so what's the difference? I know I could easily find 20 posts made by others here with questions to you and you come back and say you are to busy to answer, but you'll get back to it later and later never arrives. Petra P.S. Canie, I'm not attacking him, just stating the facts. He's on a two week time clock that keeps repeating the same message every two weeks. With that in mind one of two things will happen. A. He will be summarily ignored and or B. I'll be in the kitchen frosting cookies again.
Follow Ups: ● Re: Just For You - EQF 12:16:30 - 12/28/2002 (17664) (0) ● Re: Just For You - Canie 08:55:06 - 12/27/2002 (17659) (0) ● Re: Just For You - Don in Hollister 01:01:03 - 12/27/2002 (17658) (1) ● Re: Just For You - EQF 12:28:49 - 12/28/2002 (17665) (0) |
|