Ear tone points of origin
Posted by EQF on November 13, 2002 at 06:27:18:

LOCATING THE FAULT ZONES RESPONSIBLE FOR EAR TONES

People who are interested in determining where the fault zones are located which are responsible for their ear tones can try the following. I do not know how accurate the results would be as this still relies on theories. But my own data indicate to me that this procedure can produce good results.

Seismic Activity and Storm Data – Signal Data
http://www.freewebz.com/eq-forecasting/131.html#Signal-Data

Those are data for earthquakes and the earthquake precursor signals with which I myself am working including “Ear Tones” (left = let, right = ret).

I believe that if comparisons are made between the numbers in the ac, am, ci, la, and sa columns for the precursors such as Ear Tones in the table (normal text lines) with similar number for the earthquakes (dark text) higher up in the table (later dates) then when matches are found it may indicate where the fault zone responsible for the signal is located. The ac and am numbers would be the most important for those matches. All of the original numbers had 0, 90, 180, or 270 degrees added to them so that the ones listed there are in the 0 to 90 longitude degrees range.

For example, a Left Ear Tone listed there for 02/11/08 appears to be a fairly good match for the following earthquake:

2002/11/11 23:39:28 32.37N 80.07W 5.0 4.2 B SOUTH CAROLINA
(NEIS data)

UTC date sig aeql  ac am   ci la sa
02/11/11      80   14 81   77 29 76
02/11/08 let       14 90   79 57 16

People could send me e-mail notes with the UTC dates and times when they heard the ear tones. And I would try to send them a return e-mail note with the numbers associated with those times. They could then watch the list to see if any earthquakes occurred which matched their numbers. Usually there is a match within a few days. But on occasion it may take several months.

Or, if they stated in their e-mail note that their data should be added to the list then I could create some type of code for doing that so that their Ear Tone times could be distinguished from my own. If they wished they could then have their data removed from the list upon request when time became available to do that.

I myself am not presently studying my Ear Tone data except to occasionally check to see if they match the onset of a solar storm, or where the sun was in the sky at the time they occurred and when the earthquake occurred. Those are the slat and slon data in the table.

A theory which has been discussed by others in this bulletin board proposes that Ear Tone durations can be linked with how far away the fault zone is which is responsible for them. I am not familiar with the details of that theory. And although I myself record duration times they are not listed in that 131.html table at this point. However, that type of information could be easily added to it if desired.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Ear tone points of origin - Petra Challus  18:26:53 - 11/13/2002  (17360)  (3)
        ● Re: Ear tone points of origin - EQF  01:51:35 - 11/14/2002  (17364)  (0)
        ● Re: Ear tone points of origin - Don In Hollister  20:03:35 - 11/13/2002  (17362)  (0)
        ● Re: Ear Tone Experiencer And Proud Of It!  - Jan Santa Rosa  19:23:26 - 11/13/2002  (17361)  (1)
           ● Re: Ear Tone Experiencer And Proud Of It!  - Petra Challus  20:16:41 - 11/13/2002  (17363)  (0)