aftershocks etc
Posted by Mary C. on April 12, 2002 at 15:41:52:

> As per "scoring," the controversy here could easily be cleared up by labeling one's prediction as one for an aftershock, if applicable, and duly tightening one's parameters. <

So would you also label FFA events and tighten their parameters? Sometimes competition can foster so many arguments about rules that it loses usefulness and becomes a guessing game. Too many stacked-up rules could prevent any contest entries. I haven't entered competitions on this board because I didn't have a prediction to fit them. Are predictions really useful investigative tools if conjured to match dates and rules?
Mary C.



Follow Ups:
     ● Re: aftershocks etc - Lowell  21:27:55 - 4/12/2002  (14826)  (0)
     ● Re: aftershocks etc - Cathryn  17:17:58 - 4/12/2002  (14818)  (1)
        ● Re: aftershocks etc - Mary C.  20:17:15 - 4/12/2002  (14823)  (1)
           ● Re: aftershocks etc - Cathryn  08:38:34 - 4/13/2002  (14848)  (0)