Re: ring probabilities
Posted by Roger Hunter on April 02, 2002 at 20:02:16:

.02;

That's correct; "what are the chances of a quake in this ring?".

Adding magnitude tests is trivial and probably should be done. It's important at the higher end.

But at least this way I know the answer is wrong.

It's probably in the distance calculation, altho the rings look ok on the map.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● .02 - question - Roger Hunter  13:25:09 - 4/3/2002  (14555)  (1)
        ● Re: .02 - question - 2cents  20:33:38 - 4/4/2002  (14624)  (1)
           ● Re: .02 - question - Roger Hunter  06:04:40 - 4/5/2002  (14636)  (0)