|
Re: ring probabilities |
.02; That's correct; "what are the chances of a quake in this ring?". Adding magnitude tests is trivial and probably should be done. It's important at the higher end. But at least this way I know the answer is wrong. It's probably in the distance calculation, altho the rings look ok on the map. Roger Follow Ups: ● .02 - question - Roger Hunter 13:25:09 - 4/3/2002 (14555) (1) ● Re: .02 - question - 2cents 20:33:38 - 4/4/2002 (14624) (1) ● Re: .02 - question - Roger Hunter 06:04:40 - 4/5/2002 (14636) (0) |
|