Re: .02 - question
Posted by 2cents on April 04, 2002 at 20:33:38:

Roger:

Very good. You are really starting to cook now!

I think that what you have is a good trade-off.

However, I would like to see what more quakes and 10 minutes buys as well. If the accuracy only creeps up a few percentage points in 5 minutes more time then 5 mins total is quite livable IMO.

I suppose you are using a 5 year catalog due to the higher density of smaller quakes being available at all (versus a 28 year catalog where Mag < 4 may not be available?) and of course to make it run faster. Correct ?

Good job. Where do you find the time anyway ?

.02



Follow Ups:
     ● Re: .02 - question - Roger Hunter  06:04:40 - 4/5/2002  (14636)  (0)