|
Re: .02 - question |
Roger: Very good. You are really starting to cook now! I think that what you have is a good trade-off. However, I would like to see what more quakes and 10 minutes buys as well. If the accuracy only creeps up a few percentage points in 5 minutes more time then 5 mins total is quite livable IMO. I suppose you are using a 5 year catalog due to the higher density of smaller quakes being available at all (versus a 28 year catalog where Mag < 4 may not be available?) and of course to make it run faster. Correct ? Good job. Where do you find the time anyway ? .02
Follow Ups: ● Re: .02 - question - Roger Hunter 06:04:40 - 4/5/2002 (14636) (0) |
|