test 2
Posted by Roger Hunter on March 27, 2002 at 11:53:12:

Here's another try.


 1              . Petra
2002/3 /23 - 2002/3 /29 40.28  -123.8  3.4 4.4 40  Prob. 0%

The following quakes match the prediction to some degree.
   DATE       TIME        LAT      LON    MAG  DIST(km) PROB
2002/03/27 03:52:45.29  40.4387 -126.9515 4.63   267.4  70.1%

 Best date 2002/03/27 03:52:45.29  40.4387 -126.9515 4.63 .5
 Best dist 2002/03/27 03:52:45.29  40.4387 -126.9515 4.63 267.36721
 Best size 2002/03/27 03:52:45.29  40.4387 -126.9515 4.63 4.63
 Best prob 2002/03/27 03:52:45.29  40.4387 -126.9515 4.63 Prob. 70.1%

 2              . Don
2002/3 /22 - 2002/3 /26 42.3   -129.9  4   5   35  Prob. 0%

The following quakes match the prediction to some degree.
  DATE        TIME       LAT      LON     MAG  DIST(km) PROB
2002/03/27 03:52:45.29  40.4387 -126.9515 4.63   321.2  50.4%

 Best date 2002/03/27 03:52:45.29  40.4387 -126.9515 4.63 2.5
 Best dist 2002/03/27 03:52:45.29  40.4387 -126.9515 4.63 321.20727
 Best size 2002/03/27 03:52:45.29  40.4387 -126.9515 4.63 4.63
 Best prob 2002/03/27 03:52:45.29  40.4387 -126.9515 4.63 Prob. 50.4%


Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● That's better - Roger Hunter  11:56:13 - 3/27/2002  (14258)  (2)
        ● Re: That's better - EQF  15:05:01 - 3/27/2002  (14273)  (0)
        ● Re: That's better - Lowell  11:57:22 - 3/27/2002  (14259)  (1)
           ● Re: That's better - Don In Hollister  13:03:11 - 3/27/2002  (14265)  (2)
              ● Re: That's better - Lowell  13:26:27 - 3/27/2002  (14267)  (0)
              ● Re: That's better - Lowell  13:22:20 - 3/27/2002  (14266)  (1)
                 ● Re: That's better - Lowell  14:50:55 - 3/27/2002  (14270)  (0)