|
Postscript: all read |
I forgot the original reason for the question! It's this; in cases where there are more than one "hit" quake there mak=y be a variety of probabilities. Now if probability is the tie-breaker, shouldn't both contestants have the benefit of the least probable quake? This complicates my life considerably. I'd have to remember every possible winning quake in each category and calculate the probabilities of all of them to get the least likely. I can do it of course, but is it worthwhile? Contestants, how do you feel about it? Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Postscript: all read - Lowell 23:54:50 - 3/23/2002 (14043) (1) ● Re: Postscript: all read - Roger Hunter 05:23:34 - 3/24/2002 (14047) (1) ● Re: Postscript: all read - 2cents 11:52:48 - 3/24/2002 (14060) (1) ● Re: Postscript: all read - Roger Hunter 13:19:14 - 3/24/2002 (14063) (1) ● Re: Postscript: all read - 2cents 14:58:34 - 3/24/2002 (14068) (1) ● Thanks. n/t - Roger Hunter 15:34:45 - 3/24/2002 (14069) (0) |
|