Re: Evaluation question
Posted by Roger Hunter on March 12, 2002 at 12:09:01:

Michael;

Looked at your 5373 but my objections to it still stand. You give credit for things too distant in time and space if a large quake is predicted.

I think what I'm proposing will achieve the same thing but with more reasonable cutoffs.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Evaluation question - michael  16:33:21 - 3/12/2002  (13617)  (1)
        ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter  19:07:08 - 3/12/2002  (13624)  (1)
           ● Re: Evaluation question - Lowell  22:33:49 - 3/12/2002  (13635)  (2)
              ● Re: Evaluation question - michael  16:41:49 - 3/13/2002  (13674)  (0)
              ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter  04:40:58 - 3/13/2002  (13646)  (1)
                 ● Re: Evaluation question - Lowell  07:07:36 - 3/13/2002  (13651)  (1)
                    ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter  07:54:25 - 3/13/2002  (13654)  (0)