|
Re: Evaluation question |
Michael; Looked at your 5373 but my objections to it still stand. You give credit for things too distant in time and space if a large quake is predicted. I think what I'm proposing will achieve the same thing but with more reasonable cutoffs. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 16:33:21 - 3/12/2002 (13617) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 19:07:08 - 3/12/2002 (13624) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Lowell 22:33:49 - 3/12/2002 (13635) (2) ● Re: Evaluation question - michael 16:41:49 - 3/13/2002 (13674) (0) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 04:40:58 - 3/13/2002 (13646) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Lowell 07:07:36 - 3/13/2002 (13651) (1) ● Re: Evaluation question - Roger Hunter 07:54:25 - 3/13/2002 (13654) (0) |
|