|
Re: Link to Terracycles |
I would tend to discount most of this. Tides are a very minor component of seismicity IMHO. It's a scaling problem. the oceans are like dew on an apple. Solar energy heating the core? Be serious. It takes forever for energy to get down there. Tides don't drive the plates. Convection cells drive the plates along with upwelling at the ridges and subduction in the trenches. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Link to Terracycles - David Thomson 18:37:26 - 12/13/2001 (11905) (2) ● Re: Link to Terracycles - Canie 19:36:11 - 12/13/2001 (11910) (1) ● Re: Link to Terracycles - David Thomson 20:08:04 - 12/13/2001 (11914) (1) ● Re: Link to Terracycles - Canie 22:41:27 - 12/13/2001 (11922) (1) ● Re: Link to Terracycles - David Thomson 09:24:56 - 12/14/2001 (11932) (0) ● Re: Link to Terracycles - Roger Hunter 19:30:00 - 12/13/2001 (11908) (1) ● Re: Link to Terracycles - David Thomson 21:25:11 - 12/13/2001 (11917) (1) ● Re: Link to Terracycles - Roger Hunter 20:04:45 - 12/14/2001 (11955) (2) ● Re: Link to Terracycles - bobshannon.org 22:45:48 - 12/14/2001 (11963) (0) ● Tidal Forces According to NASA - David Thomson 21:31:56 - 12/14/2001 (11958) (2) ● Re: Tidal Forces According to NASA - Canie 22:42:58 - 12/14/2001 (11962) (1) ● Re: Tidal Forces According to NASA - David Thomson 23:11:57 - 12/14/2001 (11966) (2) ● Re: Tidal Forces According to NASA - Roger Hunter 15:02:51 - 12/15/2001 (12007) (1) ● Re: Tidal Forces According to NASA - David Thomson 22:55:11 - 12/15/2001 (12046) (1) ● Re: Tidal Forces According to NASA - Roger Hunter 07:44:02 - 12/16/2001 (12057) (0) ● Re: Tidal Forces According to NASA - 2cents 03:29:52 - 12/15/2001 (11975) (1) ● Re: Tidal Forces According to NASA - David Thomson 07:32:37 - 12/15/2001 (11988) (1) ● Re: Tidal Forces According to NASA - Roger Hunter 14:30:23 - 12/15/2001 (12005) (0) ● Actually, Lowell's backed up many of Dave's points - Billion Watts 22:34:54 - 12/14/2001 (11961) (1) ● Re: Actually, Lowell's backed up many of Dave's points - Canie 07:27:46 - 12/15/2001 (11985) (2) ● Re: Actually, Lowell's backed up many of Dave's points - Roger Hunter 19:21:44 - 12/15/2001 (12029) (2) ● Re: Actually, Lowell's backed up many of Dave's points - David Thomson 22:57:22 - 12/15/2001 (12047) (0) ● Re: Actually, Lowell's backed up many of Dave's points - Canie 21:27:01 - 12/15/2001 (12033) (0) ● Re: Actually, Lowell's backed up many of Dave's points - David Thomson 07:42:32 - 12/15/2001 (11989) (2) ● Re: Actually, Lowell's backed up many of Dave's points - Canie 16:19:48 - 12/15/2001 (12015) (0) ● Re: Actually, Lowell's backed up many of Dave's points - 2cents 13:06:48 - 12/15/2001 (12003) (0) |
|