|
Re: Absolutely STUNNING Data – September 20, 2013 |
EQF; I have to point out that for all your examples of how it works, there are 3 or 4 similar cases that don't fit. If you can't condense things down to rules that determine when (at least) major quakes can be expected, you're just fooling yourself. Amit, for example, has very specific rules relating to the moon and some of the planets which he is convinced indicate when a quake will happen. The fact that the results are no better than chance makes no impression on him and I fear that you are in the same situation. Roger Follow Ups: ● RE: Solomon Islands Earthquake - September 21, 2013 - EQF 09:32:18 - 9/21/2013 (100890) (1) ● Re: RE: Solomon Islands Earthquake - September 21, 2013 - Skywise 17:13:39 - 9/21/2013 (100897) (1) ● Re: RE: Solomon Islands Earthquake - September 21, 2013 - EQF 07:45:34 - 9/22/2013 (100898) (0) ● Re: Absolutely STUNNING Data – September 20, 2013 - EQF 03:07:06 - 9/21/2013 (100885) (2) ● Re: Absolutely STUNNING Data – September 20, 2013 - Roger Hunter 09:59:00 - 9/21/2013 (100892) (0) ● Re: Absolutely STUNNING Data – September 20, 2013 - EQF 03:17:34 - 9/21/2013 (100886) (0) |
|