|
Re: Quake Time Correction – July 4, 2013 |
Perhaps you should try actually reading the posts for a change. My posts clearly and repeatedly stated that an earthquake is expected in the future. But, in some cases such as this one the earthquake warning signal was also tied in some manner with one that had just occurred. The signal and fault zone mechanism appears to be fairly complex. My posts also stated that this is not expected to be an aftershock for that earthquake. Follow Ups: ● Re: Quake Time Correction – July 4, 2013 - Roger Hunter 17:04:31 - 7/4/2013 (100678) (2) ● Re: Quake Time Correction – July 4, 2013 - Amit 08:46:46 - 7/8/2013 (100683) (1) ● Re: Quake Time Correction – July 4, 2013 - Roger Hunter 15:47:08 - 7/9/2013 (100689) (0) ● Re: Quake Time Correction – July 4, 2013 - EQF 17:55:11 - 7/4/2013 (100679) (1) ● Re: Quake Time Correction – July 4, 2013 - Roger Hunter 21:22:54 - 7/4/2013 (100680) (1) ● Re: Quake Time Correction – July 4, 2013 - EQF 00:05:39 - 7/5/2013 (100681) (0) |
|