Hi Shan,

Now that my new earthquake forecasting Data Web page is fairly well organized I am attempting to encourage other earthquake forecasting researchers around the world to compare notes with one another to see how well their methods and data match.

Your forecasting method and Dr. Pavel Kalenda’s ground tilt sensors are so similar that they should be detecting some signals at the same times as one another. And I recommend that you consider contacting him and working with him and his research group in an effort to compare your times for when significant signals are being detected. He is working with multiple sensors that are located in various countries. But some of his and your signals should match. In fact since yours cover such a wide area, perhaps quite a few of the signal times would match.

One of my own earthquake forecasting program updates involves expanding the program so that it can be used to compare data from various forecasters. Roger and I already had one version of the program running that could do that. But that was for a separate program. And I now need to incorporate those computer code into my main forecasting computer program so that everything works together.

We have already demonstrated that the EM Signals that I work with are frequently excellent matches for the signals that Pavel is working with. In theory that should probably be the case. But it is amazing to me to see it actually happen.

These are personal opinions.