Re: Not to Worry
Posted by Sheryl in IL on November 02, 1999 at 20:17:38:

Geez, Diane...sure hope you're gonna apologize for that "we can blow this prediction off" comment. I thought this was an open forum, or is it only open to those that agree with you?? Sure hope this doesn't get me banned from here, but this is also not the first time I've seen a statement like this from you. Somehow I don't think YOU are the leading authority on just when a quake is gonna strike. I'm not saying you haven't been impressive, cuz you HAVE been, but you also don't need to act like you are the only one that might have the right answers....seems kinda snobbish.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Sorry - Diane  22:05:35 - 11/2/1999  (900966)  (1)
        ● east of SAF? - Cathryn  22:44:38 - 11/2/1999  (900972)  (1)
           ● Re: east of SAF? - Diane  07:31:43 - 11/3/1999  (900981)  (3)
              ● Re: east of SAF? - Elizabeth  21:55:00 - 11/3/1999  (900994)  (1)
                 ● Re: east of SAF? - Jeanine  22:03:59 - 11/3/1999  (900995)  (0)
              ● Re: east of SAF? - LUCIAN  13:04:42 - 11/3/1999  (900988)  (1)
                 ● Re: east of SAF? - Jeanine  22:30:44 - 11/3/1999  (901000)  (1)
                    ● Re: Jeanine - Diane  17:23:01 - 11/4/1999  (901033)  (1)
                       ● Re: Diane - Jeanine  23:15:36 - 11/4/1999  (901047)  (0)
              ● Re: east of SAF? - Cathryn  10:17:08 - 11/3/1999  (900983)  (1)
                 ● Re: east of SAF? - LUCIAN  13:08:04 - 11/3/1999  (900989)  (1)
                    ● Re: east of SAF? - Cathryn  13:40:25 - 11/3/1999  (900990)  (0)
     ● Re: Not to Worry - Marc  21:41:18 - 11/2/1999  (900965)  (1)
        ● Re: Thanks Mark, but.. - Diane  22:09:37 - 11/2/1999  (900967)  (1)
           ● Re: Thanks Mark, but.. - Cathryn  22:51:50 - 11/2/1999  (900973)  (0)