Re: Far-field aftershocks from Peru
Posted by Lowell on June 24, 2001 at 13:22:14:

They say the first sign you are getting old is failing memory. Well, it looks like
I have arrived. You are quite right it was January 1700.
While I have you on the line, though, there was a Ml 3.1 near Gustine, California
a few minutes ago. The far-field forecast stated that the Central San Andreas (i.e.
Central California) was a location where far-field aftershocks were likely, so this
might be one of those. It occurred after a series of small foreshocks.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Far-field aftershocks from Peru - Lowell  13:39:09 - 6/24/2001  (8118)  (1)
        ● Re: Far-field aftershocks from Peru - Roger Hunter  05:32:05 - 6/25/2001  (8131)  (1)
           ● Re: Far-field aftershocks from Peru - Lowell  07:21:49 - 6/25/2001  (8135)  (0)