Re: Far-field aftershocks from Peru
Posted by Lowell on June 24, 2001 at 13:39:09:

The far-field forecast as posted did not include the statement regarding Central
California that I noted in the previous post. The COMPLETE far-field forecast
some portions of which were not posted, did include the following statement, however,
and was received yesterday:
Some areas of the western U.S. most likely to see increased seismic activity:

" ...Mammoth Lakes*, Central San Andreas,... California (so. of San Jose),
Yellowstone, ...No. Utah "

Sorry about the mix-up, the author's requested that only the general, not the
specific predictions be posted. Another of my errors, seems to be my day for them.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Far-field aftershocks from Peru - Roger Hunter  05:32:05 - 6/25/2001  (8131)  (1)
        ● Re: Far-field aftershocks from Peru - Lowell  07:21:49 - 6/25/2001  (8135)  (0)