Roger did not address one of Amit's examples
Posted by Island Chris on December 16, 2012 at 07:55:30:

Roger, I'm curious because I want to know if I'm thinking clearly. You did not address the eample of Amit on this thread that I noticed.

Lets take 10 predictions for a M6+ quake. If there are 20 M6+ quakes and they all occur on one of those 10 days, and there are no days with M6+ quakes that ere not predicted, how would your evaluation technique score this?

The way I understand it, you would say that 10 out of the 20 quakes were predicted. I say that this is misleading.

Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Roger did not address one of Amit's examples - Skywise  14:31:08 - 12/16/2012  (80822)  (0)
     ● Re: Roger did not address one of Amit's examples - Roger Hunter  08:18:22 - 12/16/2012  (80812)  (1)
        ● Re: Roger did not address one of Amit's examples - Roger Hunter  08:28:29 - 12/16/2012  (80814)  (0)