|
Re: Nuclear tests |
This is probably the only time that I am going to respond to one of your EarthWaves board posts. And one of the only reasons I am willing to do that is because that one other individual has stated that he won’t be posting any more notes to this bulletin board. So I am not expecting him to cause any problems. In part because I communicate on a regular basis with people who might be at fairly high levels in different governments and organizations I have to be careful regarding whom I myself communicate with. And it is necessary for people that I talk with to follow certain Internet etiquette rules. In Newsgroup notes and notes posted to this bulletin board I believe that you made repeated attempts to tell people what my name is or what you think it might be. And in my opinion that puts you outside of the range of people with whom I can safely compare notes. I might be someone in a government witness protection program or someone who is trying to hide from an abusive spouse. And for one of those reasons I choose not to use my name on the Internet. For some reason you appear to me to have decided that such things don’t need to be considered by you. And you also appeared to be working with someone in the sci.geo.earthquakes Newsgroup who I believe has a close friend who in a past Internet Newsgroup posting suggested that governments around the world should attempt to take some type of hostile action against me. You can work with Roger on this project if you wish and compare notes all you wish. I have no objection to that. But I myself won’t work with or communicate with you. As I said, other people that I do work with expect me to behave in a responsible manner. And communicating with someone who is willing to try to identify someone else on the Internet without thinking about the possible consequences is not in my opinion, responsible behavior. If Roger sends me any data that and he tells me that they were your data I won’t post them to my Web site no matter how good they look. If he sends me some data and does not state that they are from you I will just assume that he generated them himself. These are personal opinions. Follow Ups: ● Re: Nuclear tests - EQF 19:22:31 - 11/16/2012 (80576) (0) ● NOTE TO CANIE - Skywise 13:15:21 - 11/15/2012 (80573) (1) ● Re: NOTE TO CANIE - Canie 23:55:42 - 11/16/2012 (80578) (1) ● Re: NOTE TO CANIE - EQF 00:39:30 - 11/17/2012 (80580) (0) |
|