foreshocks, not aftershocks
Posted by heartland chris on April 13, 2012 at 08:32:51:

I posted the 6.2 as an aftershock of the 6.9. It was a foreshock (it came before). And the 6.2 had its own foreshock. Would not be a bad idea to study these closely, to compare to the southern Californa 1987 M6.2 (?) Ellmore Ranch left-lateral triggering about 1/2 day later the M6.6(?) Superstition Hills.

Canie, I remember you posting a few times before that quakes in Gulf of California are followed by quakes in southern California. I just don't recall that this actually happened in the last decade. May be a task for Roger.

Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: foreshocks, not aftershocks - Roger Hunter  09:47:31 - 4/13/2012  (79806)  (1)
        ● Gulf of Cal vs. SOCAL - heartland chris  09:58:48 - 4/13/2012  (79807)  (3)
           ● Re: Gulf of Cal vs. SOCAL - Canie  19:42:22 - 4/15/2012  (79821)  (0)
           ● Re: Gulf of Cal vs. SOCAL - Roger Hunter  16:24:08 - 4/13/2012  (79811)  (1)
              ● Re: Gulf of Cal vs. SOCAL - heartland chris  21:28:19 - 4/13/2012  (79812)  (1)
                 ● Re: Gulf of Cal vs. SOCAL - Roger Hunter  04:21:59 - 4/14/2012  (79813)  (0)
           ● Re: Gulf of Cal vs. SOCAL - Roger Hunter  12:18:42 - 4/13/2012  (79810)  (0)