My data indicate to me that there are high probability dates for significant aftershocks at certain time intervals following an especially powerful earthquake. They might be intervals such as 2 weeks, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months, and 1 year. Those are the times when the sun and moon are once again in locations in the sky that favor triggering another earthquake in some area where a powerful one has occurred.

The second concern that I had was that some of the March 6 signals (lines 4, 5, and 6) were moderately good matches for the two highly destructive Japan earthquakes (lines 1 and 2) that occurred in 1995 and 2011.

The third thing that I was quite concerned about was the high quality line peak pattern match between the EM Signal detected on March 12, 2012 (line 3) and those two destructive Japan earthquakes (lines 1 and 2).

For research purposes, examining those data it could also be seen that the line peak patterns for the two destructive Japan earthquakes looked similar to one another even though the earthquakes had occurred about a half dozen years apart. That suggests to me that they might have been triggered by somewhat similar sun and moon gravity, ocean tide, Solid Earth Tide, and Tide Generating Force related forces. The 1995 earthquake that occurred at 135 E looks more like earthquakes in my database file that occurred around 142 E.

The powerful March 14, Japan earthquake can be seen on line 7. Its line peak pattern indicates that it is a fairly good match for earthquakes in my database file that occurred around 125 E rather than 145 E. My theories propose that these mismatches occur because earthquakes occurring at some longitude are not always triggered by the same type sun and moon gravity related forces.

However, some of the EM Signals detected on March 6 (lines 8, 9, and 10) are fairly good matches for that earthquake. And that indicates to me that they were probably pointing to its approach even though my present computer programs could not accurately determine from those signals what the correct longitude would be for the earthquake.

The Earthquake Warning that I circulated on March 7, 2012 and the Japan area data that I sent to some people, later confirmed by them, represented one of the more accurate and timely Earthquake Warnings I have circulated to date. And in my opinion, the fact that this warning was based on EM Signals detected on the opposite side of the planet from where the earthquake occurred provides a certain amount of proof that our governments could probably be accurately predicting a good percentage of our highly destructive earthquakes.

My forecast location data for earthquakes are being generated with computer programs that rely on complex probability equations. If triangulation procedures could be used to determine the locations where these EM Signals are being generated then far more accurate and timely earthquake forecasts might be possible.

My research indicates to me that the Ear Tones that many people around the world detect can at times work quite well with these computer programs. And people are usually willing to make those data available for free. So there are no good or acceptable reasons for our governments being unable to accurately predict powerful and destructive earthquakes.