Re: On the Lunar Onfluence of Earthquakes
Posted by Skywise on December 26, 2011 at 20:31:19:

Well, he's gonna think what he wants to think. Nothing I can do about that, and not worth wasting time trying, IMNSHO. There's actually a couple items he mentioned recently that I'd question, but again, not worth my time. I am a bit surprised, though, that no one else picked up on them.

Anyway, I just wanted to share some of my own thoughts on the topic. Contrary to what Ed and others may think, I am not "anti-prediction" or dogmatic or what-have-you. I don't just dismiss people's prediction ideas out of hand because I "don't think it can be done." On the contrary, I dismiss them with logic, reasoning, analysis, and facts. I think it's possible. I also think it hasn't been done yet. Someday. Maybe. Hopefully in my lifetime. That would be nice to see.

Brian


Follow Ups:
     ● Request for Canie – December 27, 2011 - EQF  05:41:02 - 12/27/2011  (79503)  (1)
        ● Re: Request for Canie – December 27, 2011 - Skywise  12:04:48 - 12/27/2011  (79508)  (0)
     ● Re: On the Lunar Onfluence of Earthquakes - Roger Hunter  20:50:36 - 12/26/2011  (79498)  (1)
        ● we did include the fault orientation - John Vidale  21:46:22 - 12/26/2011  (79499)  (1)
           ● Re: we did include the fault orientation - Skywise  22:13:53 - 12/26/2011  (79500)  (0)