Update Posted By EQF On November 28, 2011

The following earthquake has just occurred.

2011/11/28 12:26:49 -5.532 153.680 50.4 6.4 Papua New Guinea Area

At the time of this posting there have not been any Internet news reports that I could find that said anything about the earthquake being destructive. However, on the USGS map it looks like it was out in the ocean. And it might have (hopefully) just created a small wave.

The earthquake is close enough to one of the longitudes listed in the original post in this thread (154 E versus 155 E) that I suspect that it might have been responsible for the strong EM Signals that were detected on November 12, 2011.

Some tests need to be run to see if the earthquake is a good match for those signals. If so then my advisory will be formally ended.

There is no sharp line peak at 154 E on the recent Time Windows on my latest forecasting chart dated November 18, 2011. I used a completely different method to get the longitude values listed in my original post. That method works for only a small percentage of EM Signals that I work with. But it can provide fairly accurate and reliable longitude numbers.

One or more EarthWaves posters will probably complain as usual that if a person waits long enough for an earthquake to occur at some location then one will eventually occur there.

Stating something like that is a dangerous game to play. And it is quite literally a matter of life and death that an entirely different view be taken.

When human lives are at stake, it is far more important to gamble some time and energy on developing approaches for saving some of them regardless of whether or not they might work. Time and energy spent on some potentially life saving effort can be expended with relatively little loss even when the effort is not successful. That happens all the time with medical research.

There is no way to recover or compensate for human lives once they have been lost!

Saying that we can’t afford to devote even miniscule amount of time and energy to some life saving effort is really just looking for a lazy excuse not to do anything.

Another excuse in this bulletin board that people use regarding this is to state that my own technology is not proven or understood etc. etc. etc.

However, one of the forecasting methods that I have spent a considerable amount of time trying to get people around the world to do some research on over the years is the sun shadow based method that (earlier) board poster Shan has developed.
http://earthquake.itgo.com/today.htm

He has stated that any interested and serious researchers can have free access to all of the details regarding how his technology works. And his identity is not any type of secret.

In spite of that, as far as I am aware, no other person on the planet has ever attempted to use his relatively simple and free forecasting technology. Sunlight doesn’t cost anything. Earthquakes don’t occur anywhere near where I live. So it would be a waste of time for me to try his method.

This largely proves that when someone proposes that my technology is not being used for various reasons it is just so much hot air. They are often just looking for convenient excuses not to do anything.

These are personal opinions.

• Sun Shadow Based Forecasting Method