|
Re: Biggest earthquake in No. France/So. Britain in 11 years |
It isn't amazing in the slightest. It's like predicting a magnitude 2 in New York and getting a magnitude 5 in Quebec. Totally different in scale and location. Or to try and put in a different perspective: if I predicted "a small mammal" was going to appear in my street tomorrow (with every expectation of seeing a cat), and instead an elephant escaped from a circus the other side of town, would you say I'd made an "amazing call" then? Follow Ups: ● Re: Biggest earthquake in No. France/So. Britain in 11 years - Cathryn 12:33:11 - 6/9/2001 (7898) (2) ● Re: Biggest earthquake in No. France/So. Britain in 11 years - Roger Musson 08:37:01 - 6/11/2001 (7922) (0) ● Difficulty in Evaluating what was meant in predictions - Lowell 13:35:24 - 6/9/2001 (7899) (2) ● Re: Difficulty in Evaluating what was meant in predictions - dib 20:42:16 - 6/10/2001 (7917) (1) ● Re: Difficulty in Evaluating what was meant in predictions - Lowell 21:10:11 - 6/10/2001 (7919) (1) ● Re: Difficulty in Evaluating what was meant in predictions - Roger Hunter 07:46:49 - 6/11/2001 (7920) (0) ● Re: Difficulty in Evaluating what was meant in predictions - Cathryn 16:00:25 - 6/9/2001 (7901) (1) ● Re: Difficulty in Evaluating what was meant in predictions - lowell 16:46:36 - 6/9/2001 (7902) (0) |
|