EQF;

> The signal – earthquake correlation is likely too complex for whatever test you are considering. Remember, my own computer programs are using complex probability equations to compare signals and earthquakes. So what you would likely be doing is conducting probability tests on other probability tests.

I don't think so. That's why I want the signal times and not the graphs.

> As I have said, if you are going to try to generate “expert” level comments on this forecasting program then you need to try to first determine how it works.

You keep saying that but it still isn't true and actually it doesn't matter anyway.

> A list of some strong EM Signal times and earthquakes that followed has been available at my Web site since the last major Etdprog.exe program update. And that was a good part of a year ago. The times are in the Datatest.dat file that you could have easily downloaded at any time. I will send you an E-mail copy anyway.

Got it, thanks. But it isn't what I need.

> The actual Datatext.dat file that I use for earthquake forecasts has records for more than 3000 EM Signal times. For certain reasons that I don’t want to discuss in a public forum, that large file is never circulated.

I can think of several reasons for that.

> Finally, as I said in the past, I am still trying to get some important local matters settled. And that is requiring much of my time and effort. That situation will continue for perhaps another week or two.

Priorities, priorities. People are dying while you do other things.

> I am trying to stay current with Earthquake Warnings. But finding time to answer questions etc. can be difficult or impossible.

Sure.

Roger