Interesting, thanks for posting, but worse than worthless also. I think they forgot wildfires. And, did not weight for expected fatalities or damage or whatever.

I personly think the bulls-eye for earthquake risk/earthquake hazard (not the same thing)is badly misleading: the next big mid continent quake is more likely to be just outside the high risk zone, in Arkansas, Indiana, Illinois. Or somewhere unexpected. It's kind of like seismologist cluelessness for thinking the NE coast of Honshu would only have M7.5 or 8.0 quakes. They should make seismologists take logic classes before they can work.

I'm cranky because I had to work on a sunny Saturday.

Chris