Re: Earthquake List Accuracy Question (plus) Earthquake Research Computer Program Project – April 2, 2011
Posted by heartland chris on April 02, 2011 at 07:12:58:

I'm sure Roger has more to say, but I would not use the 7 day list: quake information is being constantly revised, and some quakes are removed altogether (mine blasts, automated systems locating non-existant quakes from the seismic waves of other quakes). Also, using the 7 day list, 1/7 of the quakes are in the last 24 hours.

It would be probably easier to just use a later list (Roger would know where to find it) and there are other catalogues than USGS. Also, the USGS list has all quakes >2.5 in USA, but only >4.5 in other parts of the world unless "significant" (unusual). Only aftershocks >=4.5 are listed.
Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Earthquake List Accuracy Question (plus) Earthquake Research Computer Program Project – April 2, 2011 - Roger Hunter  10:07:46 - 4/2/2011  (78527)  (1)
        ● Re: Earthquake List Accuracy Question - EQF  05:25:45 - 4/3/2011  (78533)  (2)
           ● Re: Earthquake List Accuracy Question - Skywise  11:54:45 - 4/3/2011  (78535)  (1)
              ● Re: Earthquake List Accuracy Question - Roger Hunter  12:49:10 - 4/3/2011  (78536)  (1)
                 ● Re: Earthquake List Accuracy Question - Skywise  14:37:44 - 4/3/2011  (78539)  (0)
           ● Re: Earthquake List Accuracy Question - Roger Hunter  07:11:07 - 4/3/2011  (78534)  (1)
              ● Re: Earthquake List Accuracy Question - EQF  13:58:53 - 4/3/2011  (78537)  (1)
                 ● Re: Earthquake List Accuracy Question - Skywise  14:51:38 - 4/3/2011  (78540)  (1)
                    ● Re: Earthquake List Accuracy Question - EQF  15:42:24 - 4/3/2011  (78541)  (0)