|
Re: EQF, here's the problem |
No, HERE is the problem. I haven't seen one prediction from EQF that seems to have any use. The predictions are generally non-specific, the few charts I have seen seem to show longitude as a big factor (mostly useless). It is obvious that many pseudo-scientists are intelligent and seem to have some sort of agenda. However, I AM insulted by the constant insinuations, by EQF many other amateurs without sound scientific basis, that scientists are lazy, overpaid, close minded, etc. I am TIRED of the pseudo scientists of the world. They inhibit true progress. I would hope that the more intelligent of these pseudo-scientists get their tail feathers off to the nearest University to learn some solid science and maybe make real contributions. A solid course in statistics would be a good beginning. Specific predictions beyond the range of chance will get respect. OK, rant over. Follow Ups: ● pseudo-scientists vs. amateur scientists - heartland chris 20:41:59 - 3/15/2011 (78369) (1) ● Re: pseudo-scientists vs. amateur scientists - Skywise 22:22:13 - 3/15/2011 (78371) (0) ● Re: EQF, here's the problem - Roger Hunter 18:00:17 - 3/15/2011 (78368) (0) ● well said - heartland chris 15:01:04 - 3/15/2011 (78367) (1) ● Re: well said - PennyB 23:02:26 - 3/15/2011 (78373) (0) |
|