|
Re: Something I haven't seen before... |
Hi Penny...our snow is melting...I suppose yours is not much yet except in sun? Art Sylvester and others trenched the broad Santa Ynez zone near the east end Lake Cachuma and thought there was 1 large Holocene earthquake, and it was left-lateral. Farther east, in Blue Canyon, on the north edge of the fault zone near a path in heavy brush (or, should I say, poison oak), I measured strike slip slickensides with fibrous growth for near pure left-lateral, with right-lateral conjugate faults. No way to tell if these were young because whole fault zone not exposed. On the other hand, there is no sign of systematic left-lateral offsets of gullies across the fault, as was noted in a 1956(?) paper (Page and someone?). I never published my ~200 fault slip measurements from upper Santa Ynez Valley, but I did publish my 500 measurements from Santa Cruz and Santa Rosa island in obscure publications. I don't do field work any more except on ships. I still hike, which is really what I was doing back then. Namson and Davis had the Santa Ynez as a thrust fault. Maybe it has been both. Maybe it still is both on different strands. So, how about a field work story from you? Follow Ups: ● Re: Something I haven't seen before... - PennyB 14:48:45 - 2/14/2011 (78062) (0) |
|