Re: Japan region quake - A date hit
Posted by Amit Dave on December 01, 2010 at 09:31:27:

Predicting aftershocks -cycle quake theory
please note yet another proof of -cycle quake theory-
My cycle quake theory states-
If there is a prone date, which is fixed as per my theory, the dates/days 15 days and 7 and half days before and after (predicted date)are also prone for quakes.
Note quakes in November 2010 are
3rd,10th,16/17 th ,23rd and 30th November. All quakes were more than 6.0 (except on 16/17 th -5.9)
This happens due to various position of Moon ( a main trigger in earthquakes)
Let one date is fixed as main quake date ( as per theory). Now ,as Moon moves 90 degrees every 7 days (approx),before and after evrey 7 and half days, it occupies yet another similar ,but less potent location.
Thus cycle quakes occur
In fact, it is easiest way to predict a major after shock ,at a place ,where a major quake (7+) have already occurred.
I would go to the extent of saying, people should be warned ,on 7/8th day and 14/15th day for aftershock after a major quake of 7+


Follow Ups:
     ● Wave Charts December 3, 2010 - EQF  16:25:11 - 12/3/2010  (77850)  (0)
     ● Re: Japan region quake - A date hit - Amit Dave  05:37:26 - 12/3/2010  (77849)  (1)
        ● Re: Japan region quake - A date hit - Amit Dave  09:24:36 - 12/9/2010  (77854)  (1)
           ● Re: Japan region quake - A date hit - Roger Hunter  16:26:51 - 12/9/2010  (77855)  (1)
              ● Re: Japan region quake - A date hit - Amit Dave  00:17:19 - 12/10/2010  (77856)  (0)