|
|
|
Re: Japan region quake - A date hit
|
Posted by Amit Dave on December 01, 2010 at 09:31:27:
Predicting aftershocks -cycle quake theory please note yet another proof of -cycle quake theory- My cycle quake theory states- If there is a prone date, which is fixed as per my theory, the dates/days 15 days and 7 and half days before and after (predicted date)are also prone for quakes. Note quakes in November 2010 are 3rd,10th,16/17 th ,23rd and 30th November. All quakes were more than 6.0 (except on 16/17 th -5.9) This happens due to various position of Moon ( a main trigger in earthquakes) Let one date is fixed as main quake date ( as per theory). Now ,as Moon moves 90 degrees every 7 days (approx),before and after evrey 7 and half days, it occupies yet another similar ,but less potent location. Thus cycle quakes occur In fact, it is easiest way to predict a major after shock ,at a place ,where a major quake (7+) have already occurred. I would go to the extent of saying, people should be warned ,on 7/8th day and 14/15th day for aftershock after a major quake of 7+
Follow Ups:
● Wave Charts December 3, 2010 - EQF 16:25:11 - 12/3/2010 (77850) (0)
● Re: Japan region quake - A date hit - Amit Dave 05:37:26 - 12/3/2010 (77849) (1)
● Re: Japan region quake - A date hit - Amit Dave 09:24:36 - 12/9/2010 (77854) (1)
● Re: Japan region quake - A date hit - Roger Hunter 16:26:51 - 12/9/2010 (77855) (1)
● Re: Japan region quake - A date hit - Amit Dave 00:17:19 - 12/10/2010 (77856) (0)
|
|
|