|
1 in 400 |
Interesting, thanks. The odds they give are in in 400 in the next 2 weeks. Is not just BC; would be from northern California (Mendocino) through Washington state. But, the odds must be based on some stress model: I don't think they've seen tremor actually immediately preceed a Great quake....yet. Also, I don't know the latest research, but I doubt the whole subduction zone goes in one M9 everytime. It may have in 1700, but other times it may go over a longer period of time in a series of M8+ quakes, which would normally have smaller tsunami, and which might not too much affect buildings at the opposite end of the subduction zone. qualification on these comments: I do not read the seismology journals on this sort of stuff: I encounter some of it at talks/posters/meetings. Chris Follow Ups: ● some problems - John Vidale 19:59:52 - 11/27/2010 (77836) (1) ● 2007 indeed - John Vidale 20:05:59 - 11/28/2010 (77838) (1) ● Re: 2007 indeed - Canie 10:11:17 - 11/29/2010 (77840) (1) ● Re: 2007 indeed - EQF 05:11:20 - 11/30/2010 (77843) (0) |
|