|
Hi **, What's On The Menu Today? Canie, Please Clarify |
Geez **, I'd think about half of the geo sciences community has heard from you at one time or another, therefore I remain mystified as to why you do not clearly state your name as the author of your opinions/hypotheses/theories. From time to time you drop in, put up usually your own link, rarely contribute, but have told at least me that you are recognized and appreciated by the "global scientific community" for your earthquake forecasts and warnings and claim a very high ratio of hits. While more information around the net in a good format is surely a welcome sight, I just don't understand why you don't want to use your name. Canie, could you please clarify if the above post infers that this gentleman is in any way, shape or form part of the governing body of this message board and if so, in what capacity. Thank You......Petra
Follow Ups: ● Re: Canie, Please Clarify- OK - Canie 12:54:02 - 5/28/2001 (7778) (1) ● Re: Canie, Please Clarify- OK - Don in Hollister 13:54:04 - 5/28/2001 (7779) (1) ● Re: Canie, Please Clarify- OK - Canie 14:09:14 - 5/28/2001 (7781) (1) ● Re: Canie, Please Clarify- OK - Petra Challus 16:33:56 - 5/28/2001 (7783) (1) ● Re: Canie, Please Clarify- OK - Canie 19:10:58 - 5/28/2001 (7784) (2) ● Re: Canie, Please Clarify- OK - Roger Musson 09:11:27 - 5/29/2001 (7788) (1) ● Re: Canie, Please Clarify- OK - Canie 09:42:41 - 5/29/2001 (7789) (1) ● Re: Canie, Please Clarify- OK - Roger Musson 03:28:43 - 5/30/2001 (7801) (1) ● Re: Canie, Please Clarify- OK - Canie 07:51:49 - 5/30/2001 (7802) (1) ● Re: Canie, Please Clarify- OK - Roger Musson 07:50:10 - 6/1/2001 (7829) (0) ● Thank You Canie - Petra Challus 22:09:23 - 5/28/2001 (7785) (0) |
|