Roger,

That isn't what I meant.

What you are doing is using probability equations to evaluate earthquake predictions that people are making.

However, the locations that I am generating are themselves being generated using probability equations. So, if you try to evaluate them you are using probability equations to evaluate probability equations. And that is not the direction in which this type of effort should be moving.

The direction that things should move is to look at the original probability equations and try to improve them. And that should be possible with my next few program updates. The factors in the equations can be changed. And determinations can be made to see if the locations for the expected earthquakes got more or less accurate.

One of the nice things with that type of effort is the fact that earthquakes by themselves can be used with this type of effort by using what I refer to as "Earthquake Pairs." If the evaluations of the Earthquake Pairs get more accurate then the EM Signal evaluations should also get more accurate, I believe.

As I said earlier, this is all too complex to discuss in detail at the moment. When the programs are available the picture will get clearer.