|
Re: one more 7+ date hit |
EQF; I certainly will since you can't back it up with facts. Skywise is right. The first duty of a scientist is to try every way possible to disprove his new theory. A valid theory must explain all the known data and ideally predict new facts. You don't just look for things to support the theory. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: one more 7+ date hit - Amit Dave 01:04:00 - 6/16/2010 (77236) (1) ● Re: one more 7+ date hit - Roger Hunter 06:38:00 - 6/16/2010 (77237) (1) ● Re: one more 7+ date hit - Amit Dave 06:48:39 - 6/16/2010 (77238) (2) ● Re: one more 7+ date hit - Roger Hunter 08:05:58 - 6/16/2010 (77240) (0) ● Re: one more 7+ date hit - Roger Hunter 08:04:53 - 6/16/2010 (77239) (1) ● Re: one more 7+ date hit - Amit Dave 01:35:51 - 6/17/2010 (77255) (1) ● Re: one more 7+ date hit - Roger Hunter 06:32:01 - 6/17/2010 (77257) (0) ● Re: one more 7+ date hit - EQF 11:07:29 - 6/15/2010 (77226) (1) ● Re: one more 7+ date hit - Roger Hunter 16:48:01 - 6/15/2010 (77232) (0) |
|