Re: well==roger
Posted by Amit Dave on February 26, 2010 at 01:45:03:

Roger
1) What you are saying is about my blog on 10th Jan 2010, where in five dates were suggested, including 28th Feb 2010.
2) since this was posted after first week of January, my post dt 25th Nov 2009 should also have been taken in account. Complete first week of January was termed as major quake prone and two dates were suggested ,1st and 3rd January 2010
3) we have two quakes of 6.5 and above on 3rd January 2010.ie 6.5 and 7.2 at Salomon
4) Besides we have
2.1.2010 6.2 Mariana
17.1.2010 6.3 Darke passage
18.1.2010 6.0 Guatmala
29.1.2010 6.0 Vanuatu
1.2.2010 6.5 Bouganville

5) on one had we are talking about 3years,5,12,40 and 220 years lapse based only on time, accuracy of major quakes in first week of January 2010 is not justified ?
regards
Amit Dave


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: well==roger - Roger Hunter  08:37:23 - 2/26/2010  (76656)  (0)