Re: well==roger
Posted by Roger Hunter on February 26, 2010 at 08:37:23:

Amit Dave;

> 1) What you are saying is about my blog on 10th Jan 2010, where in five dates were suggested, including 28th Feb 2010.

That's correct.

> 2) since this was posted after first week of January, my post dt 25th Nov 2009 should also have been taken in account. Complete first week of January was termed as major quake prone and two dates were suggested ,1st and 3rd January 2010

Sorry, I took that list as complete, especially since the earlier post was not visible. But while you talked about quakes in the first week you only predicted one for the first of January. And that was a miss. Your predicted longitudes were wrong too.

> 3) we have two quakes of 6.5 and above on 3rd January 2010.ie 6.5 and 7.2 at Salomon

Which you did not predict.

> 4) Besides we have
2.1.2010 6.2 Mariana
17.1.2010 6.3 Darke passage
18.1.2010 6.0 Guatmala
29.1.2010 6.0 Vanuatu
1.2.2010 6.5 Bouganville

None of which were predicted by you.

> 5) on one had we are talking about 3years,5,12,40 and 220 years lapse based only on time, accuracy of major quakes in first week of January 2010 is not justified ?

Since you missed them, no.

Roger