EQF, research scientists looked at this before you did. The effect is so weak that they did not find any statistical correlation and with a few exceptions still have not for actual earthquakes. The recent publication was not significant brittle earthquakes, it was motion below. This could affect the occurence of earthquakes above, but easily with enough of a delay that the occurence would have no correlation to tides.
I think John Vidale has addressed this often enough but apparently you were not paying attention.

Also, thanks for your explanation of your method, but it is misleading to say it is EM when you are using eartones. People like me have serious problems (don't believe) that eartones are related to some EM or other emmission from the ground. I hear them, and am curious what they are, but we NEVER hear them at the same time in one room.

Chris