Re: M6.7 followed 22 minutes later by M7.8
Posted by heartland chris on October 08, 2009 at 07:41:03:

Beth, as others have posted the path of the last solar eclipse should have nothing to do with this. The M7.6 Sumatra likely triggered the M6.6 on another Sumatra fault; could be static stress changes, could be shaking. A few weeks ago there was a M6+ quake that preceded another 5 or 6000 km away by less than a minute, which is faster than the P wave would take to get there. So, either coincidence, or something unknown. The latest one is rather far for a M6.6 to trigger another by static stress; I have not calculated P and S wave times, but there could be a delay. I suppose we will see whether the seismologists look into this.

It seems likely that the water main breaks are unrelated to faulting, unless they line up on a surface fault. What other people have been posting on that seems more likely (shrinking and swelling of soils as they dry out/get wet etc). As suggested by someone else here, it might be worth someone looking at flow in the pipes also. The reporting is liable to be uneven; a few breaks may cause reporting of others that normally you would not have heard about.

Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: M6.7 followed 22 minutes later by M7.8 - Beth  15:55:06 - 10/8/2009  (76094)  (1)
        ● eclipse path: Roger?  - heartland chris  07:44:47 - 10/9/2009  (76102)  (1)
           ● Re: eclipse path: Roger?  - Roger Hunter  11:38:17 - 10/9/2009  (76105)  (1)
              ● Re: eclipse path: Roger?  - Beth  12:20:58 - 10/9/2009  (76107)  (1)
                 ● Aug 17 1999 - heartland chris  14:09:20 - 10/9/2009  (76108)  (1)
                    ● Re: Aug 17 1999 - Beth  19:27:05 - 10/10/2009  (76121)  (0)