Re: prediction evaluation rules; what, no comments?
Posted by Roger Hunter on January 06, 2009 at 11:04:22:

Hi all;

At the suggestion of Dr Alan Jones I have revised the text as follows:

1) Select the time span of interest.

2) Divide the time span into consecutive windows of the predicted length

3) Compute the total number of windows in the time span

4) Count the number of windows containing one or more quakes

5) Divide the number of windows containing quakes by the total number of windows. The answer is the probability that such a window will contain a quake.

The time span to be used is a matter of opinion. A long time span gives a long term average answer whereas a shorter time can better suit changing circumstances. Care must be taken that the time span does not exceed the catalog's reliable period inasmuch as network capability increases with time.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: prediction evaluation rules; what, no comments? - heartland chris  17:25:58 - 1/6/2009  (74671)  (1)
        ● Re: prediction evaluation rules; what, no comments? - Roger Hunter  17:39:01 - 1/6/2009  (74672)  (1)
           ● Re: prediction evaluation rules; what, no comments? - Canie  18:28:43 - 1/6/2009  (74673)  (0)
     ● Re: prediction evaluation rules; what, no comments? - Glen  12:35:47 - 1/6/2009  (74669)  (1)
        ● Re: prediction evaluation rules; what, no comments? - Roger Hunter  13:06:33 - 1/6/2009  (74670)  (0)