Re: still missing the first step
Posted by EQF on November 18, 2008 at 16:32:59:

The program lets people compare electromagnetic signals with earthquakes, and earthquakes with other earthquakes.

When it is run in a research mode it generates its own proof that it works. Earthquake pairs such as the two highly destructive 1999 Turkey earthquakes can be compared with one another. And in my opinion the rather extraordinary data that the program generates demonstrate that the probability is impossibly low that the displayed results could be coincidental.

But, it actually doesn’t really need to prove anything. In my opinion, it lets people forecast earthquakes with a certain amount of success. Governments around the world are desperate for that type of information. And my past experiences indicate to me that some of them will go ahead with using it and with program development efforts probably in a matter of days once they see how well it works. They won’t wait until the international scientific community formally accepts it.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: still missing the first step - Skywise  23:06:40 - 11/18/2008  (74515)  (0)
     ● as I said - John Vidale  21:23:37 - 11/18/2008  (74513)  (1)
        ● Re: as I said - EQF  02:49:19 - 11/19/2008  (74517)  (0)