Moat was 12 feet?
Posted by Glen on December 28, 2007 at 12:11:16:

Hello,

A 12 foot moat certainly would not hold a tiger, would it? I read somewhere out there that it should have been 18 feet high. I've seen these mountain lions out here jump over rocks that are 10 feet high, and these cats are no where near as large as a Bengal tiger. Somebody is going to get sued, big time...

Glen

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Moat was 12 feet? - PennyB  13:51:41 - 12/28/2007  (73072)  (1)
        ● Re: Moat was 12 feet? - Roger Hunter  14:01:36 - 12/28/2007  (73073)  (1)
           ● OK...No water in the moat? - Glen  14:48:12 - 12/28/2007  (73074)  (1)
              ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Roger Hunter  15:19:10 - 12/28/2007  (73075)  (1)
                 ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Canie  16:44:05 - 12/28/2007  (73076)  (1)
                    ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  06:15:02 - 12/29/2007  (73078)  (1)
                       ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Skywise  21:24:10 - 12/29/2007  (73087)  (1)
                          ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  21:37:26 - 12/29/2007  (73089)  (1)
                             ● Re: OK...No water in the moat? - Skywise  21:41:06 - 12/30/2007  (73094)  (0)