Re: Associated quake pairs
Posted by Roger Hunter on August 23, 2007 at 15:16:47:

Actually, John said pairs close in space and time so I looked for matched within 1 hour and <100km and found over 100 cases of 2 or more quakes this closely related.

This is odd because all of them were mag 6 or better and the first was not always the larger.

Seems to me, foreshocks or aftershocks should not be that close in size.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● first post was right - John Vidale  09:02:26 - 8/24/2007  (72515)  (1)
        ● what's anomalous? - John Vidale  09:10:36 - 8/27/2007  (72525)  (1)
           ● Re: what's anomalous? - Roger Hunter  13:37:38 - 8/27/2007  (72527)  (1)
              ● LESS clustering - John Vidale  15:21:35 - 8/27/2007  (72528)  (1)
                 ● Re: LESS clustering - Roger Hunter  19:22:28 - 8/27/2007  (72529)  (1)
                    ● diminishing samples - John Vidale  20:44:07 - 8/27/2007  (72530)  (0)