Re: Q. for Canie
Posted by Canie on July 21, 2007 at 23:42:13:

I would think those things can be discussed and linked to, just don't be cut/pasting here..

But do be careful - it's not quite fair when they can't come here and defend themselves.. so do it nicely..

Talking the theory of syzygy is one thing - being derogatory about Jim another..

I think ULF is rather interesting..

And there are some people that really think they can feel quakes about to come.. I think there are 2 - or really one sure one and then another I think is pretty good about 2/3 of the time - they really do very limited postings anywhere..

Canie


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Q. for Canie - Cathryn  05:58:44 - 7/22/2007  (72266)  (1)
        ● Re: Q. for Canie - Skywise  21:47:17 - 7/22/2007  (72275)  (1)
           ● Re: Q. for Canie - Cathryn  11:41:06 - 7/23/2007  (72285)  (1)
              ● Re: Q. for Canie - Roger Hunter  12:15:23 - 7/23/2007  (72286)  (2)
                 ● Re: Q. for Canie - Cathryn  16:32:23 - 7/23/2007  (72289)  (1)
                    ● Re: Q. for Canie - Roger Hunter  17:19:29 - 7/23/2007  (72290)  (1)
                       ● Re: Q. for Canie - Cathryn  18:54:58 - 7/23/2007  (72292)  (1)
                          ● Re: Q. for Canie - Roger Hunter  21:49:32 - 7/23/2007  (72293)  (0)
                 ● Re: Q. for Canie - Canie  16:32:04 - 7/23/2007  (72288)  (0)