Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island
Posted by heartland chris on April 02, 2007 at 06:49:37:

Shan, to be fair, on this thread you did mention areas of 3 of the 3 largest quakes in the world, ahead of time. You missed the location and time, I guess, for Solomons, but not by much. For Honshu, it was the west coast and near your 3 deg distance limit...I think a miss but need to do distance calculation.
For Vanuatu, a miss on location. You had 10 locations listed. For the largest category (6.5 to 8), you had 4 locations of which 2 were near misses.
While your predictions for the larger quakes on this thread might be called "interesting" although strictly they were misses, over the years you have predictions for so many areas that it is impossible for someone like me to just casually look at these and get any kind of feeling for whether you are betaing chance. Whether you beat chance on just this thread depends on whether the evaluator is charitable on location and time.
I don't believe these quakes have anything to do with eclipses.
Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - R.Shanmugasundaram  21:10:55 - 4/2/2007  (65050)  (1)
        ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - Roger Hunter  23:09:25 - 4/2/2007  (65061)  (1)
           ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - R.Shanmugasundaram  10:36:16 - 4/3/2007  (65094)  (1)
              ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - Roger Hunter  15:14:52 - 4/3/2007  (65114)  (1)
                 ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - R.Shanmugasundaram  20:31:11 - 4/3/2007  (65132)  (1)
                    ● Re: 7.6M over Solomon Island - Roger Hunter  21:58:04 - 4/3/2007  (65137)  (0)
     ● I have. He isn't. They don't. - Roger Hunter  08:20:06 - 4/2/2007  (65028)  (1)
        ● Re: I have. He isn't. They don't. - heartland chris  12:27:58 - 4/2/2007  (65035)  (0)