I could not locate the original discussion here of the NASA worker's study/purported results. Though I do recall reading about it somewhere, and thought it was from a reference to it on this board.

I did, however, come across Denis Glasby's posting of 14 January, wherein he enthusiastically claims another odd-ball study "has yielded a step
forward in quake forcasting [sic]". The study (link below), conducted by another group working out of grade (the Swedish Defense Research Agency), seems to make claims that, like NASA's, are unsupportable. The writer of the article states "This experience from Iceland therefore indicates that the sites of coming earthquakes can be determined years before they occur."

Any thoughts on that study, John V. or anyone?

Michael Williams
Arroyo Grande, CA USA

• New Method Provides Better Earthquake Warnings