Re: Typo
Posted by Roger Hunter on March 18, 2001 at 05:43:29:

Your argument is theoretically correct but in practical terms it makes no sense. At least not until someone clams they can predict the TIME of a quake.

The data does not justify the accuracy. It's like quoting the average of integer numbers to 10 decimal places.

In your example, the difference between 1% and 2% is not significant; they're both VERY unlikely.

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Accuracy - michael  10:31:31 - 3/18/2001  (6146)  (1)
        ● Re: Accuracy - Roger Hunter  14:08:58 - 3/18/2001  (6153)  (1)
           ● Accuracy - michael  08:06:08 - 3/19/2001  (6170)  (1)
              ● Re: Accuracy - Roger Hunter  09:24:44 - 3/19/2001  (6175)  (1)
                 ● Accuracy - michael  10:39:11 - 3/19/2001  (6177)  (1)
                    ● Re: Accuracy - Roger Hunter  10:52:37 - 3/19/2001  (6181)  (0)