|
OK, But ....... |
Glad to see your still with us Dennis! Thanks for your descriptive comments. Thats what I've been looking hoping to hear from you all along! What EXACLTY would you SUGGEST as a solution that does not require the construction of a board within a board? I'm open to ideas, always have and always will be. Michael
Follow Ups: ● Re: OK, But ....... - Canie 12:32:06 - 3/1/2001 (5590) (2) ● thats a start - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 12:57:16 - 3/1/2001 (5595) (1) ● Specifics - michael 13:08:31 - 3/1/2001 (5597) (1) ● Specifics had already been given - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita 13:28:38 - 3/1/2001 (5602) (2) ● Specifics - michael 14:35:41 - 3/1/2001 (5609) (0) ● Re: This Method Sounds Great! - mb. 14:27:25 - 3/1/2001 (5608) (0) ● Columns - michael 12:47:36 - 3/1/2001 (5591) (2) ● Re: Columns - Canie 14:24:03 - 3/1/2001 (5607) (1) ● Re: Columns - michael 14:43:42 - 3/1/2001 (5610) (1) ● Re: Columns - Canie 17:22:02 - 3/1/2001 (5616) (0) ● Re: Columns and Sampson - martin@n.i.c.e. 12:55:38 - 3/1/2001 (5594) (1) ● Predictions - michael 13:11:01 - 3/1/2001 (5598) (1) ● Re: Predictions compliment accepted... - martin@n.i.c.e. 14:21:11 - 3/1/2001 (5606) (0) |
|