Re: Agree, Why not a seperate table?
Posted by Mary Maya on February 20, 2001 at 14:23:06:

But on the same page? Just below the other table. That way it is followed along the same as the other? If that makes sense. But maybe limits? Only on 4+ or 5+ quakes. Ones that would make a difference? Like my 3.0 range of quakes below, I realize were redundent and I usually throw those little guys back. ;) But I wouldn't mind keeping tack of that 4.0.


Bye for now.

Mary Maya


Follow Ups:
     ● Separate Table? - michael  14:48:52 - 2/20/2001  (5302)  (1)
        ● Re: Separate Table? - Roger Hunter  16:19:29 - 2/20/2001  (5303)  (1)
           ● Scoring - michael  16:59:48 - 2/20/2001  (5306)  (1)
              ● Re: Scoring - Roger Hunter  19:35:11 - 2/20/2001  (5309)  (0)