|
Separate Table? |
I not sure I see the value of creating a board within the board. I mean, don't we already have a board to discuss ideas? I also don't want to become the "Miss Police", determining what is a near hit and what isn't, managing multiple responses to responses and on and on. With the formal predictions, it is quite clear if a prediction is a hit or a miss, in others words there is no subjectivity. I don't envision a scoring system for near hits because the definition of a near hit is subjective. We had this same problems for predictions, which has now resulted in the current formal protocol for predictions. Are we to set up a system for predicting near misses also? I vote we leave discussion of near hits to the board, that's what it is there for. As always, I open to any further ideas on the subject .... Michael Follow Ups: ● Re: Separate Table? - Roger Hunter 16:19:29 - 2/20/2001 (5303) (1) ● Scoring - michael 16:59:48 - 2/20/2001 (5306) (1) ● Re: Scoring - Roger Hunter 19:35:11 - 2/20/2001 (5309) (0) |
|