4D, Time Span
Posted by Glen on May 26, 2006 at 08:16:58:

Hello Roger,

Looks like you may be on something very interesting. It would have to be 4D though. The problem with pattern analysis is it does not give a clue to the big quake. In essence, I am getting bored with swarms. I'll keep hounding around, but I think the big ruptures are just too hard to predict. Info on the stress changes is still too sketchy. In general, I think we can identify regions that are prone to higher seismicity based on ongoing activity. The big pop is still elusive, unless we project in decades. Not enough history. My biggest problem is Coachella and the Anza gap. I'll continue to WAG these areas, I might get my red box afterall. The geology is very interesting.

Glen


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: 4D, Time Span - Roger Hunter  09:09:34 - 5/26/2006  (37407)  (4)
        ● Re: 4D, Time Span, Java - chris in suburbia  10:39:29 - 5/27/2006  (37446)  (1)
           ● Bye for now - Cathryn  14:53:14 - 5/27/2006  (37469)  (0)
        ● Littlerock - Glen  14:08:56 - 5/26/2006  (37416)  (0)
        ● Re: 4D, Time Span - Glen  13:54:05 - 5/26/2006  (37415)  (0)
        ● PS. - marc / berkeley  11:45:31 - 5/26/2006  (37410)  (0)